When and why do the clocks go back? Is daylight saving too dangerous?
The end of October is nigh, which means we can all look forward to an extra hour’s sleep this weekend. Yes, it’s time to put the clocks back by one hour at 2am on Sunday 28 October.
But lie-in aside, is there still a reason for maintaining this century-old tradition?
In fact, considering times have changed so much since it was introduced in 1916, is the current daylight savings system not only obsolete … but dangerous?
Why do we actually change the clocks?
Considering British Summer Time (BST) was introduced during the First World War, maybe it really is high time we at least considered reviewing the way it works.
The original reasoning behind changing the clocks with the seasons was to help wartime works make the most of daylight hours and decrease coal use.
With agriculture, manufacturing and fuel being crucial for the war effort, no one really argued about getting out of bed an hour earlier.
Fast forward 100 years though, and the same rules are still in use, even if we’ve moved on from being a coal-burning, warring nation of farmers.
So, it’s understandable that many see the clock change not only as unnecessary, but as a danger, too.
Time for change?
Road safety organisations like RoSPA and GEM Motoring Assist continue to call for a change from the current regime of GMT in the winter and GMT+1 in the summer, to Single/Double Summer Time (SDST).
This would move the clock forward to GMT+1 in the winter, and GMT+2 in the summer. This would increase evening sunlight year-round.
On the other hand, it’s as much the weather as the darkness that can lay claim to contributing to road casualty statistics in winter, but surely an extra hour of daylight at peak hours would improve driving conditions?
From 1968 through ‘71, year-round BST was trialled, and lowered the number of serious injuries on the road by 2,500. And there were fewer cars on the road back then.
Experts believe an adjustment of the clocks to GMT + 1 in the winter and GMT + 2 in the summer, could prevent 80 deaths and more than 200 serious injuries on the UK’s road each year.
The latest statistics from the Department for Transport show that of the 15,976 children hurt on Britain’s roads in 2016, nearly a quarter (22%) were hurt during the hours of 3-5pm, while more than one in three of all pedestrian casualties happened between those times.
This is in comparison to 14% of children being injured during the morning school run, between the hours of 7-9am.
In fact, in every year since 2006 the majority of road casualties have occurred between the hours of 4-6pm; each year, the number of people killed and seriously injured on the country’s roads spikes immediately after the autumn clock change, due to the suddenly-darker evenings.
GEM road safety officer Neil Worth said “Dark spells danger for pedestrians. There is a 10% rise in fatal pedestrian collisions during the four weeks after the clocks go back. This is bad news when the latest casualty figures already show a 10% rise in pedestrian fatalities year on year.
“Estimates from the Department for Transport’s own research suggest the benefits of a move to SDST would amount to nearly £140m annually, with just a modest £5m one-off investment in communicating the change.
“We believe the reasons for opposing the change – generally from those representing the interests of farmers and postal workers – are irrelevant and outdated. After all, farming technology is vastly improved, and postal deliveries take place throughout the day, not purely in the early mornings.
“GEM, in line with all safety groups, supports a change to SDST, because it will make a significant contribution to reducing deaths and serious injuries on our roads.”
New European proposal
The House of Lords is set to discuss a European proposal to end seasonal clock changes, which would essentially mean the UK would run on British Summer Time year-round. It’s a move that’s being encouraged by RoSPA.
Errol Taylor, RoSPA chief executive, said: “A move to British Summer Time (GMT+1) all year round, which is one of the options to be considered, could save many lives by providing an extra hour of daylight throughout the autumn and winter.
“This new European Commission proposal has once again brought to the fore the debate around daylight savings, and it will always reoccur until something is done about this serious issue – we know that the darker evenings which suddenly occur in the autumn kill people – so let’s take this chance to do something about this once and for all. It would be a quick and easy win for the Government, and if just one life is saved, it would be worth it.”
“The current daylight savings system is archaic, developed at a time when working practices and technology – not least automated vehicles – were a million miles from what we have today. We’d like to see the Government assess the potential benefits of the change, which could take the form of a short trial.
“Not only would a change save lives and reduce injuries, but it would also have a host of other benefits in terms of the environment, health, tourism, crime and social isolation.”
RoSPA clearly thinks that changing the daylight hours is a way of reducing serious accidents on our roads, but would it work? After all, by mid November, both morning and evening commutes will take place in darker conditions any way.
Is it a good idea? Do you find commuting in the dark a problem, or are you happy to sacrifice daylight for that precious extra hour in bed? Let us know in the comments.